Skip to content

Modelling construction delay in renewable projects

How to build a flexible delay timing structure into a project finance model, covering interest during construction, cost increases and sources of funds under delay.

Webinar · Recording · Presented by Hitansh Doda · 25 June 2026

Construction delay webinar materials

The materials from this webinar, to follow along at your own pace or share with your team.

Why construction delay is now a modelling question

Supply chain disruption, grid connection backlogs, permitting timelines and contractor capacity are extending construction periods on solar, wind, battery storage and green hydrogen projects around the world. Delay risk has moved from a tail scenario to a board-level discussion.

“Hard-coded dates are the enemy. The moment you type a date into the calculation, you have created something that won’t move when the project moves.”

Hitansh Doda, Director, Forvis Mazars APAC Energy

Project finance modellers, sponsors, lenders and independent engineers already model delay. The question now is how well the model handles it. This webinar builds a flexible delay timing structure into a project finance model. It focuses on construction cost spend and increase, interest during construction and the sources of funds available during a delay.

What you will learn about modelling construction delay

  1. Delay in the model timeline

    Adjust milestone dates and construction phasing so revenue start, debt service and other downstream dependencies flow through correctly.

  2. Cost increases against cost spreading

    Separate real cost escalation from spreading the same budget over a longer period, and see why mixing the two distorts the model.

  3. Interest during construction under delay

    Compound capitalised interest correctly, manage the circular reference it creates and test the impact on total project cost.

  4. Sources of funds under delay

    Compare a cost overrun facility, more senior debt and an equity plug when a delay creates a new funding need.

Modelling construction delay: the session in writing

The webinar treats construction delay as a core assumption of the model. It is built around four pillars: the timeline, the treatment of cost, interest during construction and the sources of funds that close a delay-driven funding gap.

The delay timeline

A single delay assumption drives every milestone. Construction start is a base date plus an offset. The commercial operation date is construction start plus duration, and revenue starts from the commercial operation date, not a fixed calendar date. Date-based flags, not hard-coded ranges, mark each period as construction or operations, so every downstream calculation moves when the delay assumption changes.

Once a date moves, these consequences are easy to miss:

  • A longer construction period increases both the size and the length of the drawdown
  • A debt maturity date set by a long-stop provision squeezes the repayment period instead of moving with the delay
  • Long-stop and sunset dates in the PPA, the EPC contract and the grid connection agreement need checking for breach

Cost spreading and cost escalation

The second pillar separates two effects that are often mixed up. Cost spreading incurs the same total budget over a longer period. Cost escalation means the delay increases total project cost. Real increases come from contractor prolongation and extended owner costs such as lender commitment fees. Materials and labour also cost more if procurement slips into a more expensive period. Liquidated damages offset part of this when the contractor is responsible for the delay.

The recommended approach builds cost spreading and cost increase as two separate layers. The base spend curve stays untouched and delay-driven increments sit on their own lines, so the bridge from base capex to delayed capex stays visible and auditable.

“Cost spreading means the total budget is incurred over a longer period: the timing changes, the total does not. Real cost escalation is different. The delay actually increases the total cost of the project.”

Hitansh Doda, Director, Forvis Mazars APAC Energy

Interest during construction

Debt drawn to fund construction accrues interest that is capitalised instead of paid in cash. That increases the debt balance and so the next period’s interest, which creates a circular reference. Because it compounds, interest during construction grows faster than the delay itself. The session recommends:

  • A documented, switchable circularity break instead of live iterative calculation
  • Interest on the opening balance instead of the closing balance
  • Cash and capitalised interest on separate lines

“IDC doesn’t grow linearly with delay, it compounds. A six-month delay doesn’t add six months of simple interest: it adds six more months of interest on a balance that has been growing the whole time.”

Hitansh Doda, Director, Forvis Mazars APAC Energy

Sources of funds under delay

A delay-driven funding gap is usually closed with some combination of a pre-arranged cost overrun facility, more senior debt (subject to gearing, cover ratios and lender consent) and a contingent equity plug. Each trades off cost, availability and the effect on cover ratios and equity returns differently. The model lets users switch between funding sources and compare the DSCR, LLCR and equity IRR side by side, following the priority and caps in the financing documents instead of an assumed order.

The example delay model

A live example model shows each pillar, including a working funding cascade. It compares a no-delay base case with two delay scenarios: one with cost spreading only and one with an added cost increase.

Construction delay modelling questions

What causes construction delay in renewable energy projects?

Supply chain disruption, grid connection backlogs, permitting timelines and contractor capacity are the most common causes across solar, wind, battery storage and green hydrogen projects.

Why does construction delay matter for a project finance model?

A delay moves milestone dates, extends interest during construction and can create a new funding need. The model has to capture all three for lenders and sponsors. Extending one date is not enough.

How is interest during construction handled under delay?

Capitalised interest has to compound correctly across the longer period, and the circular reference it creates has to be managed without distorting total project cost.

Presented by Hitansh Doda

Hitansh Doda, Director, Forvis Mazars APAC Energy

Hitansh Doda

Director, Forvis Mazars APAC Energy

Connect on LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)

Learn financial modelling in a room

Hands-on courses in person and online, taught to more than 20,000 people on one modelling standard.

Best Practice Project Finance Modelling

Build and sensitise robust cashflow models from scratch, faster in Excel. Hands-on, practitioner-led, in person or online. See dates and book your place.

View full course details: Best Practice Project Finance Modelling

Advanced Project Finance Modelling

Debt sizing, covenant monitoring, DSRAs and integrated three-way statements. Hands-on, practitioner-led training, in person or online. See dates and book.

View full course details: Advanced Project Finance Modelling

Financial Modelling for Renewable Energy and Battery Storage Projects (APAC)

Generation profiles, PPA and merchant revenue, and the incentives behind returns, plus battery storage and repowering. Practitioner-led. See dates and book.

View full course details: Financial Modelling for Renewable Energy and Battery Storage Projects (APAC)

Browse all training courses

More on this topic

Webinars

Mastering timing flags in an Excel financial model

Timing flags in an Excel financial model: reusable phase structures, regular events such as maintenance capex and the scenario control a delay needs.

Debt sizing for contracted and uncontracted revenue

Debt sizing for renewable energy: contracted and uncontracted CFADS, separate DSCR covenants, P50 and P90 cases and the downside tests lenders run.

Services

Financial Model Audit

An independent opinion on the model behind your transaction, with a red flag report on any show-stopper issues in under 5 working days.

Financial Model Development

Transaction and operational models built for you by our modellers: lender-ready, documented and handed over with the logic explained to your team.

Learn to build these models yourself

We run public and in-house courses across the full financial modelling curriculum.